Meltdown!

“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
– Richard Feynman (1918-1988) American physicist, Nobel Prize in Physics (1965)

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies”

- Ron Paul, United States Congressman, Texas.

Both of these observations are pertinent to the nuclear disaster in Japan.  In 1976, the University of Massachusetts Press published THE ACCIDENT HAZARDS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS by Richard E. Webb.   It was a completely non-ideological work based on the author’s study of nuclear power technology.  A trained nuclear physicist, Webb was an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts at the time.

Unfortunately for Webb, the scientific community had adopted the gospel that nuclear power plants were the wave of the future and were completely safe.  But if they were so safe, why had Congress enacted the Price Anderson Act strictly limiting damages for  any nuclear power plant accident?  The answer was that it was needed to guarantee that the capital could be raised to meet America’s future electricity needs since the country’s economic growth depended upon it.  Webb was universally attacked, lost  his teaching job and was shunted into obscurity. The book is still available though.  You can buy it on Amazon.com. You can read the truth that the scientific community in and out of academia deemed treasonous in their empire of lies.

Now that the chickens are coming home to roost in Japan, it is  time to revisit Webb’s study. In 2008, with Wall Street unwilling to finance new nuclear plants, U.S. Senators Joseph Lieberman and John Warner advanced legislation to provide $544 billion for new nuclear plant development.  Now Lieberman says that in light of the Japan disaster, America should reconsider its pro-nuke policy.

During the same time frame as Webb’s book, Avery Lovins published THE SOFT ENERGY PATH, arguing in favor of renewable, non-dangerous energy such as solar and wind.  Jimmy Carter, during the oil embargo, authorized the Department of Energy to launch a program promoting alternative sources of energy.  He spoke to the American people on television wearing a cardigan.  Ronald Reagan was quick to ridicule him, insisting that Americans were “not going to freeze in the dark.”  On becoming president, Reagan canceled Carter’s initiatives and directed the Department of Energy to develop breeder nuclear reactors based upon their ability to provide an endless source of energy by generating more fuel than they use.  Because of the cost and the dangers associated with the technology, Reagan’s plan went nowhere.  Instead, he announced that America would always come to the aid of the “House of Saud,” guaranteeing America’s dependence on Middle Eastern oil for the indefinite future.

Saudi troops have now entered neighboring oil-rich Bahrain to put down a Shiah-led uprising against a backward monarchy

Bahrain can't do that to protestors, only Iran can do that to protestors.

out of fear that they could be next.  Their actions are as dangerous as the breeder reactors.  Bahrain is predominantly Shiah and the absolute monarchy is Sunni. The Shiah resent the widespread discrimination against them, something that is prevalent in Saudi Arabia as well.  Iran, a Shiah nation, is not likely to stand by and accept the repression of its co-religionists.  Should it decide to take action against Saudi Arabia, the Middle East will go up in flames and because of the danger to oil supplies, the stock market will crash again.  It is already tanking so it is not hard to imagine what the impact of all-out war in the Middle East will be.  Forget any economic recovery.  Instead, there could be an economic collapse of monumental proportions, with growing demand that America intervene in the Middle East to protect its energy supplies.

With nukes now off the table and oil an unreliable energy source, coal and natural gas will soar in price, generating inflation while the economy tanks and gas hits five dollars a gallon.  The world that Henry Ford and John D. Rockefeller created will exacerbate the problem.  Ford, who first mass-produced automobiles, said that the cities were “dead,” as  Americans, armed with their cars, flocked to the suburbs.  Rockefeller, who proclaimed individualism to be “gone, never to return,” provided the fuel bland conformist suburbia needed as its lifeblood.  The entire vanilla American way of life will no longer be able to sustain itself.  Private homes heated by oil and cars, the only means of everyday transportation, will become exorbitantly expensive to maintain.  There will have to be a mass transition to electric vehicles with power generated by coal and natural gas, something not likely to happen overnight, along with a total redevelopment of infrastructure to centralize populations and provide mass-transit.  “Hold on to your hats.  It’s  going to be a bumpy ride.”

Three Hundred Billion Barrels Short

What's 300 billion barrels between friends?


Whilst all eyes have been on Egypt, with the reactionary regimes in the region pressing Obama to maintain the status quo there lest the revolution spread to them, WikiLeaks has revealed what is probably the biggest story of the moment–that Saudi Arabia has been overestimating its oil reserves by three hundred billion barrels.  Not only has Saudi Arabia reached peak production but production will actually decline in the coming years.

Energy and oil analysts have called this dramatic revelation a wake up call. They have denounced American politicians for behaving as though America’s oil- based economy could go on indefinitely and for not coming up with a comprehensive energy policy.  Perhaps they have not noticed but this is precisely what Obama has been attempting to do. The Republicans? They have had their heads in the sand and their hands outstretched to the oil companies for contributions. These monies are kicked back to the oil companies in the form of federal subsidies.  Dick Cheney notoriously refused to promote an energy policy that was not run by the oil companies themselves, having himself been the CEO of oil giant Halliburton.  The Republicans have made it clear they will thwart any effort by Obama to implement an energy policy not dictated by oil interests.

China is racing ahead of America in developing alternative sources of energy, engaging in lucrative contracts with German wind turbine technology companies and developing its wind energy sector while America lags behind in the energy dark ages.  The powers that be in America are more concerned with prosecuting Julian Assange than paying attention to the disturbing information WikiLeaks has posted with regard to Saudi Arabia’s oil supply.  Until recently, when any member of OPEC was short in its required production, Saudi Arabia would increase its production to make up the difference thus stabilizing world oil prices.  In the near future the Saudis will be unable to continue this practice which means that the price of oil is bound to increase.  To mitigate this, conservation will become a vitally important part of any comprehensive energy policy along with the development of wind and solar technology.

Made in China

While some insist that nuclear energy must be part of such a policy, the cost of nuclear power plants is beyond the scope of private enterprise. Because the Tea Party-dominated Republican Party is opposed to further government expenditures, it is difficult to see how America will be capable of expanding its nuclear energy resources.

Were it not for WikiLeaks the Saudis would have been able to perpetrate the myth of their vast oil reserves, something almost certainly known by American oil companies and CIA, most probably in collusion with them to protect the importance of the powerful American oil companies.  When the last CEO of EXXON-MOBILE retired, he left with a golden parachute of $250 million dollars, which may explain why the oil interests do not have any sense of emergency with regard to alternative energy sources.  Chevron and EXXON keep running ads about how they understand the problem but they have given no clear statement about how much they actually spend on research and development in transforming themselves into comprehensive energy companies.

Not long after Jimmy Carter was elected president, he presciently ordered the Department of Energy to begin developing clean energy sources. This was in the wake of the oil embargo that drove oil prices up dramatically thereby inconveniencing American consumers who were obliged to wait on long lines to get fuel for their cars. I am a man of a certain age; I remember this. Let me assure you, it was not fun.  But Ronald Reagan ridiculed Carter for wearing a cardigan under his jacket while addressing the nation from the White House, famously quipping, “We are not going to freeze in the dark.”  We were Americans he told us, and this was not something we were obliged to accept.

Instead, Reagan promoted breeder reactor technology at the Department of Energy, a project that never got off the ground because of the cost and serious safety hazards.  Instead, he turned back to oil, pronouncing that America would “always protect the House of Saud.”  And protect them America did, even though young Saudis increasingly resented the Saudi royal family, staging a serious protest supported by religious leaders who called from the minarets for a demonstration that took place out of sight of the Americans. One of the chief opponents of the Saudi Arabian royal family proved to be Osama Bin Laden, the founder of Al Qaeda, the perpetrator of the 9/11 attacks.  Bin Laden’s Saudi handler was Prince Turki, who served as chief of Saudi intelligence and then as the Saudi ambassador to the United States. Wealthy Saudis have contributed to Al Qaeda with money made by American purchases of Saudi oil.

Don't gimme that hippy-dippy, cars-running-on-fryer-grease bullshit!

This could all be a blessing in disguise if Obama strongly makes the case that America cannot rely on Saudi oil or oil from other Middle Eastern countries. This is not only because of the political instability but because the oil is starting to run out.  The American people need desperately to understand that unless America adopts a comprehensive energy policy, the future will become increasingly perilous.